ESPN has a weekly column called Tuesday Morning Quarterback, where a Brookings Fellow (that's a high honor, apparently) writes a long and windy football cloumn with references to military experiments, Haikus, sci-fi cable shows, political policy, and just for kicks, lots of scantily clad cheerleaders. Why can't we do that? Put together, we have five degrees (almost) in a variety of subjects. Danno can handle the history / politcial / military madness, Stev knows all the nerd fests, and I can supply the angry football ranting. As I will now. ESPN, you should be paying us.
First off, I'd like to be the millionth person to send hate the way of Bill Simmons and Colin Cowherd, amnogst other pigskin prognosticators. They managed to convince me that maybe Joey Harrington wasn't a terrible quarterback... maybe he could even do good in Atlanta with no pressure, decent runners, and a good offensive system. BULLOCKS! He's been worse than Vick, and they suck. I thought he would be a clever late round pick in fantasy who could get me some unexpected points. Now I have to cross my fingers with the likes of Jeff Garcia, Josh McCown, and Jay Cutler. ughhhhhh......
Secondly, I just called Houston the worst-run team in the league in my preview and they're already one win away from my projected season total for them. That's no good. Matt Schaub, the pride of West Chester (it's the best Chester!), is looking good and they actually have some players on D.
Detroit is surprising me as well, though I can't tell if they can really keep this going, especially if they have to rely on a guy named J.T. O' Sullivan, who should have a sports bar (or really any bar, tavern, or eating estbalishment with beverages of a refreshing nature served) named after himself immediately.
I'm terrified of picking any more Saints games because I don't want them to kill me like they did last year. Were they that good? Are they that bad now? I was furious at not getting Brees... now Eli is housing him in fantasy points.
I'm also terrified of picking any more games involving Cinncinatti. How the f--- do you give up 51 points to Cleveland? The Cavs scored less than that in the NBA finals. Every game they play could be 56-67, only I can't tell who will win.
Of course, I'm ignoring the most obvious bad news and it is right in our homeland. The Eagles are 0-2 and look like shite. Actually, it's really only the offense who looks bad. The defense has been pretty steady and most of the points given up are on the failures of offense (ball control) and special teams (that first week). I was worried about the front seven, before the season, but they haven't been too bad. The defensive backfield has been good as well, although the safeties, as Stev pointed out, allowed some long passes last night. William James made a good pick but also got beat a couple times. He's a nice nickel back but they need Lito and Sheldon in there.
But my god, the offense looks bad. They're basically relying on Westbrook to bail them out of everything. I know it's easy to trash Donovan, and with his curious comments this week, he's going to get NAILED in the press.
Much like this sympathetic Onionista, I feel for him. I really do. He's had to put up with a lot of crap over the years while not having a ton of weapons. But he just does NOT look good right now. He missed a lot of open people, he can't scramble that much anymore (which is a big relief to opposing defenses - they used to keep an extra linebacker in there to watch him), and he doesn't look sharp in his throwing. Look, it usually takes at least a full year to recover from major knee surgery. He had it at the middle of last season. He admits that he's not at 100 %, but he's probably way lower than he thinks.
Also, his receivers are not getting open. I thought they were decent, and last season, I figured he had the best receving core of his career, besides the TO year.... but now I'm not so sure. Donte Stallworth had some speed, and no one has filled that. Early last year, the Eagles had the opposite of problems, doing well on offense while sputtering a little on D. McNabb was getting long balls to Stallworth and Hank "Put The Lotion in the" Baskett with ease. Now, nothing. Kevin Curtis dropped that pass at the end, which was catchable - despite him being drilled - so he will incure some wrath in Philly this week.
In all, this looks bad, especially with the Cowboys scoring a lot, and my confidence is not too high. We can take heart, however, in one simple fact: the Eagles have a habit of starting slow. Last year, they were good but a bit inconsistent in the first half. When McNabb got hurt, I though they were surely done for, but they simplified the playbook, stepped up on D, and rallied around Jeff Garcia to win the division. In 2002, they were good for the first half but stepped up big in the second half (with a tough schedule) with A. J. Feeley stepping in. In 2003, you may remember, they started out 0-2 by getting DESTROYED at home twice, lost big to the Cowboys, and needed a miracle punt return by Westbrook just to beat the Giants. Well, they ended up with 12 wins that year. So at least the precedent has been set before where they start out poorly, everyone thinks the Cowboys are going to run away with the division, and then they come back strong in the second half.
You may notice that in two of those years, they rallied around a backup QB. Does that mean they don't trust McNabb? No, it means they do better when they simplify things. Right now, with him still hurting, they need to do that. Their defense is okay, so they need to get the running game going and not stress him out. They did that last season with Garcia in, and it worked. I've always liked Andy Reid but I'm gettting a little sick of his stubborn play calling. ESPN showed a graphic last night of how often he chose passing plays vs. the run. He was way higher than other coaches over the past few years, and lately, even higher than that. WHY? This is not the time to have McNabb throwing it every play! Last year, he let Marty Morningwheg, who was a good coordinator in San Francisco, simplify things for Garcia. Why not now? Clearly, McNabb isn't in full game, so why keep treating him like he can handle it????
I have faith in them turning it around, because they've done it before, but it won't happen unless Reid settles the f**K down. I'm wondering how long it will be before people start clamoring for McNabb to be benched or traded.... oh wait, that started at 12:35 AM Eastern time. Fantastic. I can't wait to be in Philly when the Eagles bye week is up and people are ready to storm Joe banner's office.
..
..
...
...
...
[Hey, the Steelers are back! Considering how stupid Baltimore and Cinncy look, they're a lock now. So that's nice.]
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I just finished reading TMQ, great idea. I realized while reading the column that as much as I am enjoying New England squirm, it might be best for everyone for this thing to go away quickly.
Also, my new college made it into the very end of TMQ! Mercyhurst 58, Wayne St. 50. I found out through ESPN that we have a four-page guide for appealing fines.
Yeah, he loves going through the USA today box scores and selecting obscure schools. Mercyhurst is one of the few I'm familiar with.
By the way, speaking of the Phillies, they're in a close heat with the Padres for the wild card spot. That's probably more likely than catching the Mets, because they don't play the Mets anymore. Where are the Padres this week?
That's right, PNC Park. Buccos can play the spoiler!
Look, Agent Somatic, we both know the Phils are apt to fuck things up at some point. They need our help. You're within a few hours of the 'burgh; I'm within a few hours of San Diego. Together, with enough cunning and a little trip to the piano store, we can do this.
Post a Comment